Appeal against the court's decision to terminate the Contract
Attention! The Law and Law Law Company draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a specific situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in drafting any legal document that suits your situation. For more information, please contact lawyer Kenesbek Islam by phone.; +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (727) 971-78-58.
To the Appeals Board for Civil and administrative cases of the Almaty City Court of Almaty, 050000, Kazybek Bi Street, 66.
0201@sud.kz
From the defendant: Individual entrepreneur "......" represented by gr. …………
IIN: ................ location: Almaty, ul......., d .., sq. m....
Proxy representative: Sarzhanov Galymzhan Turlybekovich IIN: 850722301036.
50 Zhibek Zholy ave., office 202, Medeu district, 050002, Almaty,
Business center Quarter. info@zakonpravo.kz / www.zakonpravo.kz + 7 (708) 578 57 58.
THE APPEAL
on the decision of the District Court No. 2 of Almaly district of Almaty dated October 19, 201.. years
October 19, 201.. District Court No. 2 of Almaly district of Almaty, composed of the presiding judge ..........., with the participation of the plaintiff's Representative, a lawyer ............., by proxy, and by warrant, the Representative of the defendant IP "......." in the face of .................. - Sarzhanov G.T., by proxy, having considered in open court, in the courthouse, a civil case, according to the statement of claim of gr. ……………... to an individual entrepreneur ".............." on the termination of the contract for the development of a mobile application and the recovery of the prepayment amount, a legal penalty, the court Decided: The claim .................. to an individual entrepreneur "............" represented by gr. ............ - partially satisfy. Terminate the mobile application development agreement No...... dated April 28, 201.. a contract concluded between an individual entrepreneur "...." represented by .................. and ...................
Collect from an individual entrepreneur ".............." represented by gr. ............., in favor of gr. ............., the amount of the prepayment in the amount of 435,000 (four hundred and thirty-five thousand) tenge, a legal penalty in the amount of 70,332 (seventy thousand three hundred and thirty-two) tenge, the cost of paying the state fee in the amount of 6,350 (six thousand three hundred and fifty) tenge, the cost of paying for the assistance of a representative in the amount of 20,000 (twenty thousand) tenge.The arguments indicated in the court's decision of October 19, 201..the year that was issued in final form on 24.10.201... the years disagree.We consider the decision of the court of first instance to be illegal, unjustified and subject to cancellation on the following grounds:Dear Board of Appeal, the court of first instance did not take into account the arguments of the defendant, According to which the Plaintiff justifies his claims that, in accordance with the Mobile Application Development Agreement No.... dated April 28, 201... concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant for a total amount of 725 00 tenge. where the Defendant has committed to develop a mobile application within 45 calendar days from the date of approval of the design of all application screens.
According to Appendix No. 1 to the Agreement.Pursuant to clause 2.2. of the Agreement, May 23, 201.. During the year, the Plaintiff transferred an advance payment to the Defendant's bank account in the amount of 30% of the Contract amount, which amounted to 217,500 tenge, which is confirmed by cash receipt order No. 48.Next, June 16, 201.. a year after the Plaintiff agreed on the design for the work under the terms of clauses 2.6. and 2.3. of the Contract, the Plaintiff transferred an advance payment to the Defendant's bank account in the amount of 30% of the Contract amount, which amounted to 217,500 tenge, which is confirmed by cash receipt order No. 61. Thus, the Defendant accepted the obligation until May 01, 201.. years to complete the work.
As a result, the total amount of the prepayment amounted to 435,000 tenge.To date, the terms of the Agreement have not been fulfilled by the Defendant, and the reasons for the improper fulfillment of the terms of the Agreement have also not been disclosed.We do not agree with the above arguments of the Plaintiff, since the Plaintiff claims that no work was performed on the part of the Defendant under the Contract and the Plaintiff does not indicate specific violations of the contract in the lawsuit, whereas according to the Mobile Application Development Agreement No.... dated April 28, 201.. According to paragraph 2.5, "The first payment is made by the Customer within 3 banking days from the date of signing this agreement," while the parties do not dispute that the Agreement for the development of a mobile application № ......... It was signed on April 28, 201.. Accordingly, we observe violations of Contractual obligations on the part of the Plaintiff, who interprets the norms of the Contract in his favor and clause 2.5., fulfilled the Contract after 26 calendar days, namely on May 23, 201.. of the year , the Plaintiff transferred an advance payment to the Defendant 's bank account in the amount of 30 % of the Contract amount in accordance with paragraph . 2.2. which amounted to 217,500 tenge, which is not disputed by the parties.
Whereas the funds were supposed to arrive before April 31, 201.. years. After transferring the first tranche of prepayment in violation of Contractual Obligations, the Defendant developed original designs and icons for the mobile application in accordance with paragraph 1., Appendix No. 1., of the Contract "........" which was agreed upon and accepted by the Plaintiff, as evidenced by the corresponding application launched on Google Play (For more information, see following the link....... and the Plaintiff's arguments are written on page 2 in the statement of claim, where the plaintiff confirms the fact of agreeing to 1., Appendices No. 1., of the Agreement literally with the words "Further, June 16, 201.. years after the approval of the Ist
Назар аударыңыз!
«Заң және Құқық» адвокаттық кеңсесі, бұл құжаттың жалпылама екендігіне және нақты сіздің жағдайыңыздың талаптарына сәйкес келмеуі мүмкіндігіне көңіл бөлуіңізді сұрайды. Біздің заңгерлер сіздің нақты жағдайыңызға сәйкес келетін кез келген құқықтық құжатты әзірлеп көмектесуге дайын.
Қосымша ақпарат алу үшін Заңгер/Адвокат телефонына хабарласуыңызға болады: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085.
Адвокат Алматы Заңгер Қорғаушы Заң қызметі Құқық қорғау Құқықтық қөмек Заңгерлік кеңсе Азаматтық істері Қылмыстық істері Әкімшілік істері Арбитраж даулары Заңгерлік кеңес Заңгер Адвокаттық кеңсе Қазақстан Қорғаушы Заң компаниясы
