Complaint to the police o to bring to disciplinary responsibility for non-fulfillment or improper performance of their official duties
Attention!
The Law and Law Law Company draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a specific situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in drafting any legal document that suits your situation. For more information, please contact lawyer Kenesbek Islam by phone.; +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (727) 971-78-58.
To the Police Department of Turkestan region, TURKESTAN, _____________________
From: LLP "_____________________" BIN _____________________
8 _____________________ email: _____________@mail.ru
Proxy representative: Law and Law Law Company LLP
BIN 190240029071 Almaty, 79/71 Abylai Khan ave., office 304
info@zakonpravo.kz / www.zakonpravo.kz + 7 727 978 5755; +7 700 978 5755
Statement
Earlier, the Specialized Interdistrict Economic Court of the Almaty region was investigating a civil case. №_____________________ according to the claim of the LLP "_____________________" to the LLP "_____________________", State Institution "Construction Department of Almaty region" on the recognition of the contract on public procurement of works as invalid. In this Civil case, the court made a Decision dated January 20, 2020, where the Statement of Claim is in satisfaction of the LLP "_____________________" to THE LLP "_____________________", the State Institution "Construction Department of the Almaty region" on the recognition of the contract on public procurement of works as invalid – to refuse. During the trial, under the chairmanship of a judge _____________________, representative of the Respondent LLP "_____________________", She provided the court with a document on the fact of the request to the Head of the State Institution "Department of construction of Saryagash district of Turkestan region" _____________________, for outgoing no.___ of __.01.20_, upon receipt of information, the construction of a school for 600 students in a locality Zhanatalap, Saryagash district, South Kazakhstan region, where the defendant asked to be informed about the date of commissioning of the above-mentioned construction facility.
Also, at the same time, the defendant's Representative provided the court with a response to Request No. 3 from the State Institution "Department of Construction of the Saryagash district of the Turkestan region". _____________________, for ex. No. __, dated __.01.20__, where it was stated: "At your request for ex. No. __ dated __.01.20._, regarding the dates of commissioning of the built school for 600 students in the settlement of Zhanatalap, Saryagashsky district of South Kazakhstan region, we explain the following. The construction of a school for 600 students in the village of Zhanatalap, Saryagashsky district of South Kazakhstan region was carried out by LLP "_____________________" in the period from November 20__ to August 20__. The actual completion and delivery of the works were carried out in August 20__. Initially, an Act of acceptance of the facility for operation dated __.09.20__ was signed and issued for the specified facility. However, later it was reported by the registration authorities that errors had been made during the registration of the act and the assignment of the number, and therefore the same act of acceptance of the facility for the same facility, dated __.11.20__, was signed and issued. there are discrepancies indicated by you in the date of commissioning of a school for 600 students in the village of Zhanatalap, Saryagashsky district of South Kazakhstan region."
Complaint to the police o to bring to disciplinary responsibility for non-fulfillment or improper performance of their official duties
Paying attention to the urgency of the letter, as well as the outgoing number written in pen and the fact that the letter was delivered on purpose and the received letter is not on letterhead! We sent a reasoned letter to the above-mentioned State Organization in order to establish the authenticity of the claimed documents and asked the Construction Department to provide information on whether they had actually been given an answer for the exodus. No.__ dated __.01.20__ of the year to the letter of the LLP "______________" for ex. No.__ of __.01.20__ year. Subsequently, from the State Institution "Department of Construction of the Saryagash district of the Turkestan region", the Head _____________________, The response for ex was received on the letterhead in electronic form.No.__ of __.02.20__ of the year where it is written: "In response to your request for the authenticity of the submitted documents, we inform you that on the part of the LLP "_____________________" for ex. No.__ of __.01.20__. no complaints have been received. Accordingly, the State Institution "Saryagashsky district Construction Department" is responsible for exodus. No.__ of __.01.20__ did not send. In addition, all letters in the department are sent through the Unified Electronic Document Management System of Government Agencies (UESED).
The copy of the letter that is attached in your letter does not correspond to reality. In this regard, we ask you to provide the original letter for law enforcement agencies." The results of the inspection and materials were sent to the Police Department of the Saryagash district of the Police Department of the Turkestan region to give a legal assessment of the actions of the leaders of the LLP. "_____________________". Then we made a request for information to the UE of the Saryagash district of the Turkestan region in order to find out about the investigative measures carried out and ongoing against the leaders of the LLP. "_____________________" on the fact of forgery of documents. In the response from the OD Saryagash ROP, we learned that this material __.03.20__ of the year Saryagash ROP was registered in the KUI for № _____________________. To make matters worse, this material was written off in the nomenclature case, based on the fact that it was considered in the Specialized Interdistrict Economic Court of the Almaty region and the decision was made in favor of the LLP. "_____________________",.
Complaint to the police o to bring to disciplinary responsibility for non-fulfillment or improper performance of their official duties
We hereby want to clarify that in the Specialized Interdistrict Economic Court of the Almaty region (hereinafter referred to as the SMEC of the Almaty region) region, this fact, namely, the forgery of documents by the leaders of the LLP "_____________________", not considered. Moreover, the SMEC of the Almaty region is not competent and is not competent to consider case materials where there are signs of a criminal offense. As for the case that was under investigation in the SMEC of the Almaty region, a civil case was considered there on the claim of the LLP "_____________________" to THE LLP "_____________________" on the recognition of the contract on public procurement of works as invalid. Thus, it has been established that no legal proceedings have taken place on the fact of forgery of documents to date, and currently this case with signs of a criminal offense remains open to this day. In addition, according to the above-mentioned material of the pre-trial investigation, the police officers of the Saryagash ROP of the Turkestan region are very negligent, as evidenced by the fact that they did not even check which case was considered in the SMEC of the Almaty region, only believing the testimony of the representative of the LLP. "_____________________" and they wrote off the materials of the case in the nomenclature file.
Complaint to the police o to bring to disciplinary responsibility for non-fulfillment or improper performance of their official duties
We are saddened that in our country there is such a practice that officials, law enforcement agencies and judges begin to consider cases objectively only after contacting a higher authority, posting information on social networks and creating a public outcry. We are extremely outraged by the irresponsible actions of incompetent police officers of the Saryagash district Police Department of the Turkestan region, who discredit the good name of the Police. Based on the above and in accordance with Articles 71, 192 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, I ASK YOU:
In accordance with the procedure established by law, take appropriate procedural measures to eliminate violations of the law.;
To bring to disciplinary responsibility responsible police officers of the Saryagash district of Turkestan region for non-fulfillment or improper performance of their official duties;
To respond to the application within the time limits prescribed by law and provide an order to bring responsible employees to disciplinary responsibility.;
Sincerely, Proxy Representative ___________/Sarzhanov G.T. "___" ________ 2020 G.
Attention!
Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.
For more information, please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085.
Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office Court Cases
