Appeal to the chairman of the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Chairman Mergaliyev Aslambek Amangeldinovich
to the Lord
From The Defender: Lawyer Sarzhanov Galymzhan Turlybekovich
Legal Office" law and law"
IIN 201240021767.
Republic of Kazakhstan, 050002, Almaty,
Almaly district, Abylai Khan Ave., house 79/71, office 304.
www.zakonpravo.kz info@zakonpravo.kz
Tel.: +7 708 578 57 58 / 8 727 978 57 55.
Suspect: in the interests of AE K
Yin
Turkestan Region, District m, Village N E, zh Street, house 12.
Complaint
Dear Aslambek Amangeldinovich,
The reason for our appeal to you is related to the occurrence of injustice and illegality, so on March 08, 2025, the interdistrict court for criminal cases of Shymkent city sent a lawyer's request No. 0803/25 through the application e-application, in which we wrote on May 02, 2019 in relation to judge of Al-Farabi District Court for criminal cases of Shymkent City Sabit Torehanov, defendant Makhamatov Dilmurat Sultanmurtovich No. 5211-00-19-1/195, No. 5299-19-00-1A/151, having considered the criminal case and found guilty of illegal missionary activity, the court sentenced him.
In the case of senior investigator of the Investigation Department of the Police Department of Maktaaral District of the Police Department of the Turkestan region for sharing one of these sermons in the social network of Vatsap, the convicted Makhamatov Dilmurat is investigating a criminal case in relation to ERDR No. 255143031000056 registered with signs of criminal offenses under Article 174 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan AE Kanatbaevich Yin 861106302013.
During the investigation, E. K. A. was detained on March 2, 2025 in accordance with Article 131 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan and placed in a temporary detention center of the Police Department of Maktaaral district for intentional actions aimed at inciting social, National, Tribal, racial, family-group or religious discord, insulting national honor and dignity or religious feelings of citizens.
In accordance with Article 99 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, participants in criminal proceedings have the right to apply to the person conducting the pre-trial investigation, the prosecutor, the judge (court) with a request to establish circumstances relevant in the course of the criminal process, to carry out procedural actions or make procedural decisions to ensure the rights and legitimate interests of the person
In accordance with subparagraph 2), 3), 6) of Paragraph 3 of Article 33 of the law of the Republic of Kazakhstan" on advocacy and legal assistance "in order to provide qualified legal assistance and on the basis of Notification No. 0803/25 dated March 08, 2025:
* May 02, 2019 submission of judicial acts to the Al-Farabi District Court in criminal cases of the city of Shymkent to the defendant Makhamatov Dilmurat Sultanmurtovich for all stages of the criminal case;
* 02 May 2019 e-mail the materials of the criminal case on the criminal case of the Al-Farabi District Court in criminal cases of the city of Shymkent to the defendant Makhamatov Dilmurat Sultanmurtovich info@zakonpravo.kz send, or allow familiarization.
However, in the case of income No. 5241 24-5-17/3019 No. 5211-00-19-1/195 we received the following response in which the court stated that "on your lawyer's request dated 11.03.2025, the main trial in the criminal case against Dilmurat Sultanmuratovich Makhamatov, sentenced to imprisonment by the verdict of the Al-Farabi District Court of Shymkent dated 02.05.2019 in a closed court session we bring to your attention that copies of the documents of the case in connection with the passage are not issued to persons who do not belong to the number of participants in criminal proceedings and are not provided for by criminal law.»
We cannot agree with the answer of the interdistrict Criminal Court of Shymkent, since the answer of any court must be legal and justified, as well as judicial acts. At the same time, if the answer was dismissed, the answer should be given based on the norms of the law, referring to them.
In the response of the interdistrict court for criminal cases of Shymkent, in case of disagreement with this answer, it was obliged to explain by what code or law we can file a complaint, where.
In accordance with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, restriction of publicity of judicial proceedings is allowed only if it contradicts the interests of protecting state secrets and other secrets protected by law. In order to prevent the disclosure of information about the intimate side of the life of persons participating in the case, in cases of criminal offenses of minors, in cases of sexual crimes and other cases, as well as in cases where it is required by the interests of the safety of the victim, witness or other persons participating in the case, as well as their family members or close relatives, a closed trial is allowed by a reasoned Court decision.
At the same time, in Part 3 of this article, only the introductory and resolution parts of the sentence in cases considered at a closed court session are publicly disclosed.
On some issues of application of legislation on judicial power in the Republic of Kazakhstan, in accordance with Part 11 of the normative resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated May 14, 1998 n 1, judges may be brought to disciplinary responsibility only on the grounds provided for in Article 39 of the constitutional law "on the judicial system and the status of judges.
According to this rule, a gross violation of the law should be understood as a clear and significant violation of the law, committed intentionally or as a result of negligence, negligence or ignorance of the law.
At the same time, in the response of the interdistrict court for criminal cases of Shymkent, the normative resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 6, 2002 No. 25 on compliance with the principle of publicity of legal proceedings in criminal cases – gross violation of the law is clearly visible and “does what it knows”by the court without compliance with the law.
In accordance with article 668 of the Code of administrative offenses of the Republic of Kazakhstan and Article 435 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, obstruction of the legal activities of a lawyer entails liability established by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
On the basis of the above and in accordance with the provisions of the law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on advocacy and legal assistance,
I ask you:
* Give a legal assessment of the response of the chairman of the interdistrict Criminal Court of Shymkent A. Orakbaeva to the incoming No. 5241-24-5-17 / 3019;
* To bring to justice the chairman of the inter-district criminal court of Shymkent A. Orakbaeva in case of violations in the incoming response No. 5241-24-5-17/3019;
* To declare illegal the incoming response of the chairman of the inter-district criminal court of Shymkent A. Orakbaeva No. 5241-24-5-17/3019 and satisfy the lawyer's request No. 0803/25.
With respect,
Lawyer: Sarzhanov Galymzhan Turlybekovich
Attention!
Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.
For more information, please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085.
Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office Court Cases
