Article 784. Evaluation of evidence of the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan On Administrative Offenses
1. Evaluation of evidence is a logical mental activity consisting in the analysis and synthesis of evidence and culminating in a conclusion about the relevance, admissibility, reliability and significance of individual evidence and the sufficiency of their totality to justify the decision.
2. A judge, body (official) conducting proceedings on an administrative offense case shall evaluate evidence according to their inner conviction based on a comprehensive, complete and objective examination of the evidence in its entirety, guided by the law and conscience. No evidence has a pre-established validity.
3. Each piece of evidence is subject to assessment in terms of relevance, admissibility, reliability, and all the evidence collected together is sufficient to resolve the case.
4. Evidence is considered relevant if it is factual data that confirms, refutes, or calls into question conclusions about the existence of circumstances relevant to the case.
5. Evidence is recognized as admissible if it is obtained in accordance with the procedure provided for by this Code.
6. A proof is considered reliable if, as a result of verification, it turns out that it corresponds to reality.
7. The totality of evidence is considered sufficient to resolve a case if all relevant admissible and reliable evidence has been collected that indisputably establishes the truth about each and every one of the circumstances to be proved.
President
Republic of Kazakhstan
© 2012. RSE na PHB "Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan" of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Constitution Law Code Standard Decree Order Decision Resolution Lawyer Almaty Lawyer Legal service Legal advice Civil Criminal Administrative cases Disputes Defense Arbitration Law Company Kazakhstan Law Firm Court Cases
