Commentary to article 349. Consideration of comments on the minutes of the main trial The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Comments on the protocol of the main trial, made on paper, are considered by the presiding judge, and if he is absent for a long time (at least five days) by another judge of the same court, who has the right to summon the persons who submitted them for clarification.
Based on the results of consideration of the comments, the judge issues a reasoned decision to certify their correctness or reject them, which is not subject to appeal and protest, disagreement with it may be included in the appeal or protest. The remarks on the protocol and the judge's decision are attached to the protocol of the main trial.
Comments on the minutes of the main trial are considered by the presiding judge, and in his prolonged absence (at least five days), by another judge. If necessary, the judge has the right to summon the persons who submitted the comments.
Based on the results of consideration of the comments, a reasoned resolution is issued to certify their correctness or reject them. The decision is not subject to appeal or appeal. Arguments about disagreement with the decision may be set out in an appeal or protest.
The observations themselves and the resolution based on the results of their consideration are attached to the minutes of the main trial.
Commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Constitution Law Code Standard Decree Order Decision Resolution Lawyer Almaty Lawyer Legal service Legal advice Civil Criminal Administrative cases Disputes Defense Arbitration Law Company Kazakhstan Law Firm Court Cases
