Article 179. Pre-trial procedure for appealing decisions, actions (inaction) of control bodies and their officials of the Environmental Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan
1. Before applying to the court, a subject of control has the right to appeal the results of state environmental control to a higher authority (official) who has the right to exercise state environmental control.
2. A complaint against the result of the state environmental control shall be filed on paper or in electronic form no later than one month from the date of receipt of the results of the state environmental control.
3. If, for a valid reason, the deadline set out in paragraph 2 of this article is missed, this deadline may be restored by a higher authority (official) authorized to carry out state environmental control at the request of the control entity filing the complaint.
4. A missed deadline for appeal is not a reason for refusing to accept a complaint by the body (official) reviewing the complaint. The reasons for missing the deadline are clarified when considering the complaint and may be one of the grounds for refusing to satisfy the complaint.
5. The complaint states:
1) the name of the body (official) reviewing the complaint;
2) last name, first name, patronymic (if it is indicated in the identity document), individual identification number, postal address of an individual or the name, postal address, business identification number of a legal entity;
3) the address of the actual residence of the individual and the location of the legal entity;
4) the name of the control body, the official whose actions (inaction) are being challenged;
5) the circumstances on which the subject of control bases his claims and evidence;
6) the date of filing the complaint;
7) signature of the subject of control;
8) the list of documents attached to the complaint;
9) other information.
6. The higher authority (official) considering the complaint leaves the complaint without consideration if:
1) there is a decision of the body considering the complaint based on the results of consideration of the complaint against the subject of control on the same subject and on the same grounds specified in the complaint.;
2) there is a judicial act that has entered into legal force, issued against the same person on the same subject and on the same grounds;
3) the results of the state environmental control are simultaneously appealed to the court and to a higher authority (official);
4) the body (official) considering the complaint has accepted the withdrawal of the complaint from the applicant.
The subject of control is notified within three working days from the date of the decision of the body considering the complaint to leave the complaint without consideration.
The withdrawal of the complaint by the applicant does not prevent the re-filing of the complaint.
7. The filing of a complaint suspends the execution of an order to eliminate the identified violations, drawn up based on the results of state environmental control.
Filing a complaint against the act on the appointment of an inspection and (or) an additional act on the extension of the inspection period does not suspend the inspection. At the same time, the recognition of the act on the appointment of an inspection and (or) an additional act on the extension of the inspection period as illegal entails the cancellation of the inspection results.
8. The higher authority (official) considering the complaint is obliged to take measures for a comprehensive, complete and objective investigation of the factual circumstances relevant for the proper consideration of the complaint.
The subject and limits of the investigation of factual circumstances are determined by the higher authority (official) considering the complaint.
The higher authority (official) considering the complaint, before making a decision on the complaint, hears the official whose administrative act, administrative action (inaction) is being challenged, and the person who filed the complaint.
The hearing may be conducted in any way that allows the parties to state their position.
9. The time limit for consideration of the complaint is twenty working days from the date of receipt of the complaint.
10. Having considered the complaint, the higher authority (official) makes one of the following decisions::
1) about the satisfaction of the complaint;
2) on the satisfaction of the complaint in part;
3) about leaving the complaint without satisfaction.
Upon completion of consideration of the complaint on the merits, a decision is made in writing, which is sent to the subject of control.
The refusal to satisfy the complaint must be motivated.
When considering a complaint about the result of an audit, the legality and validity of the issued act on the results of the audit, the instructions to eliminate the identified violations based on the materials available in the case and additionally submitted, are checked. A higher official has the right to establish new facts and investigate new evidence.
11. In case of disagreement with the decision of the higher authority (official) who reviewed the complaint, the subject of control has the right to appeal the decision to the court.
ҚАЗАҚСТАН РЕСПУБЛИКАСЫНЫҢ ЭКОЛОГИЯ КОДЕКСІ 2021 жылғы 2 қаңтардағы № 400-VI ҚРЗ Кодексі.
Бапқа өзгерістер мен толықтырулар енгізілген Қазақстан Республикасының Заңымен 2026 жылғы 8 шiлдедегi № 340-VIII ҚРЗ
Қазақстан Республикасының
Президенті
Конституция Заң Кодекс Норматив Жарлық Бұйрық Шешім Қаулы Адвокат Алматы Заңгер орғаушы Заң қызметі Құқық қорғау Құқықтық қөмек Заңгерлік кеңсе Азаматтық істері Қылмыстық істері Әкімшілік істері Арбитраж даулары Заңгерлік кеңес Заңгер Адвокаттық кеңсе Қазақстан Қорғаушы Заң компаниясы Декларация Жарлық Бұйрық Қаулы Шешім Баяндама Қорытынды Өтініш Конвенция Келісімшарт Меморандум Әдістеме Нормалар Нота Ережелер Бағдарлама Жарғы Мақала Түсініктеме Қарар Регламент Хаттама Жоба Жолдау
