Commentary to article 180. Violation of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on rehabilitation and bankruptcy by a temporary administrator  The Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Administrative Offences  

     1. Failure to perform or improper performance of the obligation to send to the authorized body in the field of rehabilitation and bankruptcy announcements on the application of the rehabilitation procedure and the procedure for creditors' claims for posting on its Internet resource -

     entails a fine in the amount of fifteen monthly calculation indices.

     2. Violation of the procedure established by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on rehabilitation and bankruptcy for the formation of the register of creditors' claims -

     entails a fine in the amount of fifty monthly calculation indices.

     3. Failure to fulfill or improper fulfillment of the obligation to submit to the court conclusions on the effectiveness of the rehabilitation plan -

     entails a fine in the amount of fifteen monthly calculation indices.

     4. Non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to consider, within five working days, the debtor's application for approval of the transaction outside the framework of ordinary commercial transactions -

     entails a fine in the amount of fifty monthly calculation indices.

     5. Failure to fulfill or improper fulfillment of the obligation to provide the requested information with the attachment of supporting documents to the authorized body in the field of rehabilitation and bankruptcy -

     entails a warning.

     6. Non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to consider creditors' claims and bring the results of the review to them -

     entails a fine in the amount of fifteen monthly calculation indices.

     7. Non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to notify creditors of the place and date of the creditors' meeting -

     entails a fine in the amount of fifteen monthly calculation indices.

     8. Non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to file an application to the court for termination of the rehabilitation procedure in case of non-compliance by creditors with the rehabilitation plan and (or) failure to submit a rehabilitation plan to the court within the time period established by the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", -

     entails a fine in the amount of fifteen monthly calculation indices.

     9. Actions (inaction) provided for in parts one to eight, with the exception of the case provided for in part five of this article, committed repeatedly within a year after the imposition of an administrative penalty, -

     they entail a fine in the amount of one hundred monthly calculation indices.

     10. The action provided for in part five of this article, committed repeatedly within a year after the imposition of an administrative penalty, -

     entails a fine in the amount of fifteen monthly calculation indices.

     The commented article establishes administrative liability for violation of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on rehabilitation and bankruptcy by a temporary administrator.  

     According to paragraph 1 of Article 2 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on rehabilitation and bankruptcy consists of this Law and other regulatory legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

     The generic object of offenses provided for in Article 180 of the Administrative Code is the procedure established in the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and protected by the state for conducting business in the Republic of Kazakhstan.  

     The direct object of the offenses provided for in Article 180 of the Administrative Code is the procedure established by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on rehabilitation and bankruptcy for the rehabilitation of business entities before the appointment of a rehabilitation manager.

     The subjects of offenses provided for in Article 180 of the Administrative Code are temporary administrators.  

     A temporary administrator, according to paragraphs 30) of Article 1 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", is a person appointed by the court to compile a register of creditors' claims and coordinate transactions outside the framework of ordinary commercial transactions during the development of a rehabilitation plan.

     A rehabilitation procedure, according to clause 27 of Article 1 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", is a judicial procedure in which reorganization, organizational, management, investment, technical, financial, economic, legal and other measures are applied to an insolvent debtor, aimed at to restore the debtor's solvency in order to prevent its liquidation.

     The subjective side of the unlawful acts provided for in Article 180 of the Administrative Code is characterized by guilt in the form of intent or negligence. The guilt of a person is revealed by his mental attitude towards the illegal acts committed by him and their harmful consequences.  

     The administrative offences provided for in Article 180 of the Administrative Code are formal. To bring to administrative responsibility for their commission, it is not necessary to establish the fact that the offender caused material damage to the state, organization or citizen as a result of the commission of the offense.  

     If material damage is caused as a result of an offense, such damage may be claimed in full by an interested person whose rights and interests have been violated, since bringing the offender to administrative responsibility under the commented article does not exempt him from eliminating the violations and compensating for the damage caused.

     Cases of administrative offences provided for in the commented article are considered and administrative penalties for offenders for their commission are imposed by the state revenue authorities or the court, if the case is considered in court.  

     Part 1 of the commented article establishes the administrative responsibility of the temporary administrator for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to send to the authorized body in the field of rehabilitation and bankruptcy announcements on the application of the rehabilitation procedure and the procedure for creditors to submit claims for posting on its Internet resource.

     The objective side of the offense provided for in Part 1 of the commented article is characterized by the commission by the temporary administrator of illegal actions (inaction), expressed in non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the duty assigned to him by law to send to the authorized body in the field of rehabilitation and bankruptcy an announcement on the application of the rehabilitation procedure and the procedure for creditors' claims to be posted on his Internet resource.  

     At the request of paragraph 1 of Article 72 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator, within two working days from the date of his appointment, sends to the authorized body an announcement on the application of the rehabilitation procedure and the procedure for creditors to file claims in Kazakh and Russian for posting on the authorized body's Internet resource.

     Failure to perform or improper performance of this duty by the temporary administrator is an offense provided for in Part 1 of the commented article, for which an administrative penalty in the form of a fine is imposed.  

     The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 1 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 15 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

     Part 2 of the commented article establishes the administrative responsibility of the temporary administrator for violating the procedure for forming the register of creditors' claims established by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on rehabilitation and bankruptcy.

     The objective side of the offense provided for in Part 2 of the commented article is characterized by the commission by the temporary administrator of illegal actions (inaction), expressed in violation of the procedure established by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on rehabilitation and bankruptcy for the formation of a register of creditors' claims.

     According to paragraphs 7), paragraph 2 of Article 70 and paragraph 7 of Article 72 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged, no later than two months from the date of entry into force of the court decision on the application of the rehabilitation procedure, to form in accordance with the procedure, terms and form established by the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and send the register of creditors' claims, as well as the list of creditors whose claims have not been recognized, is submitted to the authorized body for posting on the authorized body's Internet resource.  

     Failure to perform or improper performance of this duty by the temporary administrator is an offense provided for in Part 2 of the commented article, for which an administrative penalty in the form of a fine is imposed.  

     The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 2 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 50 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

     Part 3 of the commented article establishes the administrative responsibility of the temporary administrator for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to send to the court conclusions on the effectiveness (inefficiency) of the rehabilitation plan.

     The objective side of the offense provided for in Part 3 of the commented article is characterized by the commission by the temporary administrator of illegal actions (inaction), expressed in non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation imposed on him by law to send to the court conclusions on the effectiveness (inefficiency) of the rehabilitation plan.  

     At the request of paragraphs 2), paragraph 2 of Article 70 and paragraph 7 of Article 73 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged to submit to the court an opinion on the effectiveness (inefficiency) of the rehabilitation plan.

     Failure to perform or improper performance of this duty by the temporary administrator is an offense provided for in Part 3 of the commented article, for which an administrative penalty in the form of a fine is imposed.  

The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 3 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 15 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

     Part 4 of the commented article establishes the administrative responsibility of the temporary administrator for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to consider, within five working days, the debtor's application for approval of the transaction outside the framework of ordinary commercial transactions.

     The objective side of the offense provided for in Part 4 of the commented article is characterized by the commission by the temporary administrator of illegal actions (inaction), expressed in non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the duty assigned to him by law to consider within five working days the debtor's application for approval of the transaction outside the framework of ordinary commercial transactions.

     At the request of subclause 1) of Clause 2 of Article 70 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged to consider the debtor's application for approval of the transaction outside the framework of ordinary commercial transactions within five working days.

     Failure to perform or improper performance of this duty by the temporary administrator is an offense provided for in Part 4 of the commented article, for which an administrative penalty in the form of a fine is imposed.  

     The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 4 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 50 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

     Part 5 of the commented article establishes the administrative responsibility of the temporary administrator for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to provide the requested information with the attachment of supporting documents to the authorized body in the field of rehabilitation and bankruptcy.

     The objective side of the offense provided for in Part 5 of the commented article is characterized by the commission by the temporary administrator of illegal actions (inaction), expressed in non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the duty assigned to him by law to provide the requested information with the attachment of supporting documents to the authorized body in the field of rehabilitation and bankruptcy.

     According to Article 21 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged to provide the authorized body with the requested information on the progress of the rehabilitation procedure (with supporting documents attached) in the form, in the manner and within the time limits established by the authorized body.

     Failure to perform or improper performance of this duty by the temporary administrator is an offense provided for in Part 5 of the commented article, for which an administrative penalty is imposed in the form of a warning.  

     A warning as a measure of punishment is imposed on the offender by specifying it in the decision on the imposition of an administrative penalty and its mandatory announcement, as well as handing over or sending a copy of the decision to the offender. In this case, in order to qualify further actions of the offender when committing similar offenses in the future, the person is considered to have been subjected to administrative punishment from the moment of delivery (referral) He likes it.

     Part 6 of the commented article establishes the administrative responsibility of the temporary administrator for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to consider creditors' claims and bring the results of the review to them.

     The objective side of the offense provided for in Part 6 of the commented article is characterized by the commission by the temporary administrator of illegal actions (inaction), expressed in non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the duty assigned to him by law to consider creditors' claims and bring the results of the review to them.  

     At the request of the pp.3) and 4) clauses 2 of Article 70 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged to review them and include recognized claims in the register within ten working days from the date of the creditors' claims; notify the creditor in writing of the results of the consideration of his claims (on recognition or non-recognition in full or in part) on the day following the day of the decision (indicating the reasons for non-recognition).

     According to Clause 6 of Article 72 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged to notify each creditor in writing on the day following the day of the decision on the results of consideration of creditors' claims (on recognition or non-recognition of the claim in full or in part, indicating the reasons for non-recognition). In the notice of recognition of the creditor's claim (in full or in part), the temporary administrator must also indicate the date, time, place and agenda of the first creditors' meeting.  

     Failure to perform or improper performance of this duty by the temporary administrator is an offense provided for in Part 6 of the commented article, for which an administrative penalty in the form of a fine is imposed.  

     The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 6 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 15 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

     Part 7 of the commented article establishes the administrative responsibility of the temporary administrator for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to notify creditors of the place and date of the creditors' meeting.

     The objective side of the offense provided for in Part 7 of the commented article is characterized by the commission by the temporary administrator of illegal actions (inaction), expressed in non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the duty assigned to him by law to notify creditors of the place and date of the creditors' meeting.  

     At the request of subclause 6) of clause 2 of Article 70 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged to notify all creditors of the place and date of the first creditors' meeting, which is held no later than three months from the date of entry into force of the court decision on the application of the rehabilitation procedure. According to Clause 6 of Article 72 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged to indicate the date, time, venue and agenda of the first creditors' meeting in the notification sent to the creditor on recognition of his claim (in full or in part).

     Failure to perform or improper performance of this duty by the temporary administrator is an offense provided for in Part 7 of the commented article, for which an administrative penalty in the form of a fine is imposed.  

     The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 7 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 15 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

     Part 8 of the commented article establishes the administrative responsibility of the temporary administrator for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation to file an application for termination of the rehabilitation procedure in case creditors disagree with the rehabilitation plan and (or) fail to submit a rehabilitation plan to the court within the time period established by the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy".

     The objective side of the offense provided for in Part 8 of the commented article is characterized by the commission by the temporary administrator of illegal actions (inaction), expressed in non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the obligation imposed on him by law to file an application for termination of the rehabilitation procedure in case creditors disagree with the rehabilitation plan and (or) failure to submit a rehabilitation plan to the court within the time period established by Law. RK "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy".

     According to clauses 5, clause 2, Article 70 and Clause 6, Article 82 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy", the temporary administrator is obliged, within three working days from the date of occurrence of one of the grounds, to apply to the court for termination of the rehabilitation procedure in case of refusal of the creditors' meeting to approve a rehabilitation plan or failure by the debtor to submit a rehabilitation plan in the time limit set by the court in the decision on the application of the rehabilitation procedure to the debtor.

     Failure to perform or improper performance of this duty by the temporary administrator is an offense provided for in Part 8 of the commented article, for which an administrative penalty in the form of a fine is imposed.  

     The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 8 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 15 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

     Part 9 of the commented article establishes a more severe penalty for repeated commission of any of the actions (inaction) provided for in parts 1 to 8 of the commented article within a year after the imposition of an administrative penalty, with the exception of the case provided for in Part 5 of the commented article.  

     At the same time, the object, the subjective side and the subjects of the offense provided for in Part 9 of the commented article coincide in their characteristics with the object, the subjective side and the subjects of any of the offenses provided for in parts 1 to 8 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, with the exception of the case provided for in Part 5 of the commented article.  

     In the description of the objective side of the offense provided for in Part 9 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, a sign of repetition is added to any of the acts provided for in Parts 1-4, 6-8 of the commented article.  

     An offense is considered to have been committed repeatedly if a person has previously committed any of the acts provided for in parts 1-4, 6-8 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, has been subjected to administrative punishment for it, and the one-year period during which the person is considered to have been subjected to administrative punishment has not expired yet.

An offense is considered to have been committed repeatedly if a person has previously committed any of the acts provided for in parts 1-4, 6-8 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, has been subjected to administrative punishment for it, and the one-year period during which the person is considered to have been subjected to administrative punishment has not expired yet.

     The repetition of an offense is an independent qualifying feature, entailing the qualification of an unlawful act as an independent element of an offense under Part 9 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code.  

     Repetition as a qualifying feature is established not only in fact by identifying the number and nature of the unlawful acts committed by the violator during the year, but also legally by establishing the fact of bringing this person to administrative responsibility for committing any of the offenses provided for in parts 1-4, 6-8 of art. 180 of the Administrative Code, the presence of an effective and unenforceable resolution of the authorized body or a court decision on the imposition of an administrative penalty under any of the above-mentioned parts of art. 180 of the Administrative Code, the fact of its announcement, delivery or referral to the offender and the expiration of a one-year period from the date of imposition of the penalty.

     If a person has committed an illegal act repeatedly or continues to commit it after the start of the commission and until it is revealed, but until that moment he has not previously been brought to administrative responsibility under any of the above-mentioned parts of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, then bringing him to responsibility under Part 9 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is impossible, since there is no qualifying a sign of repetition. In this case, the person must be brought to administrative responsibility and punished according to one of the above-mentioned parts of art. 180 of the Administrative Code, even if there are signs of repeated violations during the year and the uniformity of violations committed.  

     For repeated commission of any of the acts provided for in Parts 1-4, 6-8 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code within a year after the imposition of the penalty, the offender is punished with a fine.

     The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 9 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 100 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

     The case of an administrative offense under Part 9 of the commented article is being considered and an administrative penalty is imposed on the offender by the state revenue authority or the court, if the case is considered in court.

     Part 10 of the commented article establishes a more severe penalty for repeated commission of an act provided for in Part 5 of the commented article within a year after the imposition of an administrative penalty.  

     At the same time, the object, the subjective side and the subjects of the offense provided for in Part 10 of the commented article coincide in their characteristics with the object, the subjective side and the subjects of the offense provided for in Part 5 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code.  

     In the description of the objective side of the offense provided for in Part 10 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, a sign of repetition is added to the act provided for in part 5 of the commented article.  

     An offense is considered to have been committed repeatedly if the person has previously committed the act provided for in Part 5 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, has been subjected to administrative punishment for it, and the one-year period during which the person is considered to have been subjected to administrative punishment has not expired yet.

     The repetition of an offense is an independent qualifying feature, entailing the qualification of an unlawful act as an independent element of an offense under Part 10 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code.  

     Repetition as a qualifying feature is established not only in fact by identifying the number and nature of the unlawful acts committed by the violator during the year, but also legally by establishing the fact of bringing this person to administrative responsibility for the commission of an offense under Part 5 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, the presence of an effective and unturned resolution of the authorized body or court on the imposition of administrative penalties under Part 5 of art. 180 of the Administrative Code, the fact of its announcement, delivery or referral to the offender and the expiration of a one-year period from the date of imposition of the penalty.

     If a person has committed an illegal act repeatedly or continues to commit it after the start of the commission and until it is revealed, but until that moment he has not previously been brought to administrative responsibility under Part 5 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code, then bringing him to responsibility under Part 10 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is impossible, since there is no qualifying sign of repetition. In this case, the person must be brought to administrative responsibility and punished under Part 5 of art. 180 of the Administrative Code, even if there are signs of repeated violations during the year and the uniformity of violations committed.  

     For repeated commission of an act provided for in Part 5 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code within a year after the imposition of a penalty (announcement of a warning), the offender is punished with a fine.

     The amount of the fine for committing an offense under Part 10 of Article 180 of the Administrative Code is 15 MCI, is fixed and is not subject to change by the body imposing it.  

Scientific and practical commentary to the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Administrative Offences (article-by-article) from the Author's team:

     Bachurin Sergey Nikolaevich, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor – chapter 48 (co-authored with E.M. Khakimov);

     Gabdualiev Mereke Trekovich, Candidate of Law – Chapters 11, 21, 22, 23;

     Zhusipbekova Ainur Maratovna, M.yu.n. – chapter 13 (co-authored with Karpekin A.V.); chapters 33, 39 (co-authored with Seitzhanov O.T.);  

     Karpekin Alexander Vladimirovich, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor – chapter 13 (in collaboration with Zhusipbekova A.M.);

     Korneychuk Sergey Vasilyevich – chapters 2; chapter 6 (co-authored with O.T. Seitzhanov, E.M. Khakimov); chapter 8; chapter 25 (co-authored with E.M. Khakimov); articles 457-470, 488, 488-1, 491-506; chapters 28, 30, 52;

     Ilya Petrovich Koryakin, Doctor of Law, Professor – Chapter 49;

     Kisykova Gulnara Bauyrzhanovna, Candidate of Law – chapter 20;

     Omarova Botagoz Akimgereevna, Candidate of Law – chapters 17; chapter 18 (co-authored with B.A. Parmankulova); chapters 26, 31; chapter 32 (co-authored with B.A. Parmankulova);

     Parmankulova Bayan Askhanbaevna – chapter 18 (co-authored with Omarova B.A.); chapters 19, 32 (co-authored with Omarova B.A.); chapter 43 (co-authored with Tukiev A.S.);  

     Podoprigora Roman Anatolyevich, Doctor of Law, Professor - Chapter 24, articles 489, 489-1, 490;

     Porokhov Evgeny Viktorovich, Doctor of Law – Chapters 14, 15, 16, 29, articles 471-475;

     Seitzhanov Olzhas Temirzhanovich, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, – chapter 4; chapter 5 (co-authored with E. M. Khakimov); chapter 6 (co-authored with S.V. Korneychuk, E.M. Khakimov); chapter 9; chapter 10 (co-authored with B.E. Shaimerdenov, V.V. Filin); chapter 33 (co-authored with Zhusipbekova A.M.); chapter 36 (co-authored with Shaimerdenov B.E.); chapter 39 (co-authored with Zhusipbekova A.M.);

     Smyshlyaev Alexander Sergeevich, PhD. – chapters 38, 40, 42, 43-1 (co-authored with A.S. Tukiev); chapter 44;

     Aslan Sultanovich Tukiev - Candidate of Law, Associate Professor – chapters 1, 3, 35; chapters 38, 40, 42, (co-authored with A.S. Smyshlyaev); chapter 43 (co-authored with B.A. Parmankulova); chapter 43-1 (co-authored with A.S. Smyshlyaev); chapter 44-1 (co-authored with Shipp D.A.); chapter 45; 46 (co-authored with Shipp D.A.); chapter 47;  

     Filin Vladimir Vladimirovich, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor – Chapter 10 (in collaboration with O.T. Seitzhanov, B.E. Shaimerdenov);  

     Yerzhan Maratovich Khakimov, M.yu.n. – chapter 5 (co-authored with O.T. Seitzhanov); chapter 6 (co-authored with O.T. Seitzhanov, S.V. Korneychuk); chapter 7; chapter 25 (co-authored with S.V. Korneychuk); chapters 34, 41; chapter 48 (co-authored with S.N. Bachurin); chapter 53;

     Shaimerdenov Bolat Yerkenovich, M.yu.n., – chapter 10 (co-authored with O.T. Seitzhanov, V.V. Filin); chapter 12; articles 476-487, 507-509; chapter 36 (co-authored with O.T. Seitzhanov); chapters 37, 50, 51.  

     Shipp Denis Alekseevich – chapters 44-1, 46 (in collaboration with A.S. Tukiev).

Date of amendment of the act:  01.01.2020 Date of adoption of the act:  01.01.2020 Place of acceptance:  100050000000 Authority that adopted the act: 103001000000 Region of operation:  100000000000 NPA registration number assigned by the regulatory body:  5 Status of the act:  new Sphere of legal relations:  029000000000 / 028000000000 / 029002000000 / 028004000000 / 029001000000 / 026000000000 / 001000000000 / 001008000000 / 030000000000 The form of the act:  COMM / CODE Legal force:  1900 Language of the Act:  rus  

Attention!   

       Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.  

 For more information,  please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085. 

Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office  Court Cases