Payment for services is made exclusively to the company's account. For your convenience, we have launched Kaspi RED 😎

Home / Cases / The court issued a private ruling on Violation of the requirements of Article 47 of the Law "On Public Procurement", appealing actions (inaction), decisions of the customer, the organizer of public procurement, the unified organizer of public procurement, commissions, experts, a single operator in the field of public procurement

The court issued a private ruling on Violation of the requirements of Article 47 of the Law "On Public Procurement", appealing actions (inaction), decisions of the customer, the organizer of public procurement, the unified organizer of public procurement, commissions, experts, a single operator in the field of public procurement

The court issued a private ruling on Violation of the requirements of Article 47 of the Law "On Public Procurement", appealing actions (inaction), decisions of the customer, the organizer of public procurement, the unified organizer of public procurement, commissions, experts, a single operator in the field of public procurement

The court issued a private ruling on Violation of the requirements of Article 47 of the Law "On Public Procurement", appealing actions (inaction), decisions of the customer, the organizer of public procurement, the unified organizer of public procurement, commissions, experts, a single operator in the field of public procurement

The LLP filed a claim to challenge the RSU "Department of Internal State Audit".

The court's decision partially satisfied the claim. The Department's inaction regarding the failure to take measures to notify customers of the suspension of the conclusion of contracts has been recognized as illegal. The rest of the claim was denied.

The court found that the Partnership participated in tenders for the purchase of food (beef). According to the protocols of the results of the above-mentioned competitions, other potential suppliers were recognized as winners. Having disagreed with the results of the tenders, the Partnership appealed to the Department with demands to suspend the conclusion of contracts and cancel the protocols of the results of the above-mentioned purchases. Despite the fact that the Partnership has filed complaints about the above-mentioned tenders in accordance with the established procedure, the Department has not sent notifications to customers about the suspension of the conclusion of contracts. The Department has not provided any evidence to the contrary to the court.

 

Attention!   

       Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.  

 For more information,  please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085. 

Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office  Court Cases