Comment to article 374. Examination of an expert The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan
The expert may be questioned only after the announcement of the conclusion in order to clarify, clarify or supplement it, taking into account the requirements of part four of Article 285 of this Code.
The first expert is questioned by the party at whose request the examination was appointed.
If the examination is carried out by agreement between the parties or on the initiative of the body conducting the criminal process, the prosecution side interrogates the expert first, then the defense side.
The court has the right to ask the expert questions at any time during the interrogation.
Questioning an expert allows you to clarify the content of previously conducted research, clarify some of the provisions of the conclusion and supplement them if you have any questions. During the interrogation of the expert, the parties, as well as the court, can verify the expert's competence and eliminate any doubts about the conclusions.
If several experts participate in the examination, questions are asked to one of them in agreement with the others in the absence of disagreement. If there are disagreements on some issues, then questions are asked to the rest of the experts.
An expert is criminally responsible for giving a knowingly false conclusion.
Commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Constitution Law Code Standard Decree Order Decision Resolution Lawyer Almaty Lawyer Legal service Legal advice Civil Criminal Administrative cases Disputes Defense Arbitration Law Company Kazakhstan Law Firm Court Cases
