Payment for services is made exclusively to the company's account. For your convenience, we have launched Kaspi RED 😎

Home / Publications / Inadmissibility of Deprivation and Restriction of Legal Capacity and Capacity to Act

Inadmissibility of Deprivation and Restriction of Legal Capacity and Capacity to Act

АMANAT партиясы және Заң және Құқық адвокаттық кеңсесінің серіктестігі аясында елге тегін заң көмегі көрсетілді

Inadmissibility of Deprivation and Restriction of Legal Capacity and Capacity to Act

🔷 I. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

Article 18 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan establishes guarantees of a citizen’s personal freedom and legal personality derived from the constitutional principle of the inviolability of individual rights.

It includes:

  • a prohibition on arbitrary restriction of legal capacity and capacity to act;

  • requirements for the legality of actions of state and other bodies;

  • recognition of the invalidity of transactions that contradict these principles.

🔹 II. RESTRICTION OF LEGAL CAPACITY AND CAPACITY TO ACT — ONLY BY LAW (para. 1)

"No one may be restricted in legal capacity or capacity to act otherwise than in cases and in the manner provided by legislative acts."

🔸 This means that:

  • no authority, person, contract, charter, or internal regulation may deprive or restrict a person’s capacity to act without a direct provision of law;

  • even a court may do so only in accordance with the procedure established by law.

📌 Examples of permissible restrictions:

  • recognition of a citizen as having limited capacity under Article 22 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (due to a mental disorder);

  • temporary restriction on engaging in entrepreneurial activity by a court sentence (for example, prohibition from engaging in licensed activities).

📌 Example of an impermissible restriction:

  • refusal to conclude a contract due to age or citizenship (if not provided by law).

📌 Related legislation:

  • Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Articles 12, 14, 26;

  • Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On the Rights and Guarantees of Persons with Disabilities”;

  • Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan — regarding recognition of incapacity.

🔹 III. INVALIDITY OF AN UNLAWFUL ACT (para. 2)

“…entails the invalidity of an act of a state or other body…”

🔸 Acts that restrict legal capacity or capacity to act without legal grounds:

  • are legally void;

  • may be challenged in court;

  • do not produce legal consequences.

📌 Example from judicial practice:An authority refused to register a citizen’s business, referring to some “internal procedure.” The court declared the refusal invalid because it was not based on the law.

📌 Position of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan:If the restriction of rights does not arise from law or a court decision, it must be annulled through administrative or judicial procedures (see the Regulatory Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 1 of July 10, 1998 “On Certain Issues of the Application of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan”).

🔹 IV. NULLITY OF TRANSACTIONS RESTRICTING LEGAL ENTITLEMENT (para. 3)

“…a citizen’s refusal of legal capacity or capacity to act, and other transactions… are null and void.”

🔸 This establishes a prohibition on voluntarily renouncing legal personality:

  • a person cannot, by contract, renounce their civil rights or declare “I am legally incapable,” even if they voluntarily sign such a statement;

  • such transactions are null and void — they are invalid from the moment of conclusion without the need to challenge them in court (see Article 157 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan).

📌 Examples of null transactions:

  • an agreement under which a citizen renounces the right to inheritance entirely with the condition “I will never claim rights” — if it contradicts the law;

  • an agreement between an employee and an employer under which the employee voluntarily renounces labor legal capacity or pension rights — such an agreement is invalid.

🔸 Exception — only if directly provided by law:

  • delegation of certain powers by a power of attorney;

  • restrictions within the framework of family, tax, or business law.

🔷 V. RELATED LEGAL PROVISIONS

ProvisionConnection
Article 13 of the Civil Code of the RKDefinition of legal capacity
Article 17 of the Civil Code of the RKAttainment of full capacity to act
Articles 19–22 of the Civil Code of the RKRestriction/deprivation of capacity — only by court
Article 157 of the Civil Code of the RKNullity of transactions contrary to law
Article 380 of the Civil Code of the RKFreedom of contract limited by law
Constitution of the RK, Articles 12, 14Principles of equality and inviolability of the individual

🔷 VI. INTERNATIONAL NORMS

International DocumentProvision
Universal Declaration of Human RightsArticle 6 — everyone has the right to recognition as a person before the law
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)Article 16 — equality of all before the law
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with DisabilitiesArticle 12 — inadmissibility of deprivation of legal capacity on the basis of disability

🔷 VII. CONCLUSION

Article 18 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan:

If the transaction is not notarized, the registering authority is obliged to verify the authenticity of the signatures of the persons who made the transaction (their authorized representatives), their legal capacity (legal capacity), as well as the compliance of their will with the will

If the transaction is not notarized, the registering authority is obliged to verify the authenticity of the signatures of the persons who made the transaction (their authorize...

Read completely »