Payment for services is made exclusively to the company's account. For your convenience, we have launched Kaspi RED 😎

Home / Publications / Preparation of court documents and evidence

Preparation of court documents and evidence

АMANAT партиясы және Заң және Құқық адвокаттық кеңсесінің серіктестігі аясында елге тегін заң көмегі көрсетілді

Preparation of court documents and evidence

 

The preparation of evidence, a pre-trial claim, a statement of claim, and a review in a civil, administrative, or criminal case for trial is an obligatory part of the stage of proceedings in an existing case. The court of first instance and the court of appeal also creates the necessary conditions for a full, comprehensive and objective examination of the evidence presented by the parties, the actual rights and obligations of the parties subject to the application of substantive law, and the issuance of a lawful and reasoned judicial act.

At the stage of preparing the case for trial, it is necessary to find out whether the applicant has sufficient knowledge of the language in which the evidence, pre-trial claim, statement of claim, review, etc., understands the essence and content of the proceedings. If necessary, it is necessary to prepare an appropriate letter of petition from the plaintiff (applicant) to the court or other body to change the language of the proceedings. Taking into account the principle of equality of the parties, the court is obliged to find out the opinion of the defendant on this issue.

 

 

Attention!   

       Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.  

 For more information,  please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085. 

Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office  Court Cases 

Article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence of the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Administrative Offenses examined during the consideration of the complaint, the appeal petition of the prosecutor

Article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence of the Code of the Republ...

Read completely »

Failure by the plaintiff to provide evidence confirming the claims during the court proceedings is a procedural omission by the party, however, the circumstances that arose after the issuance of the judicial act are not grounds for reviewing the judicial act due to newly discovered circumstances.

Failure by the plaintiff to provide evidence confirming the claims during the court proceedings is a procedural omission by the party, however, the circumstances that arose af...

Read completely »

Presumption of innocence and relevant, admissible evidenceBy the verdict of the Oktyabrsky District Court of the city of Karaganda dated December 28, 2018: S., who had no prev...

Read completely »

Article 6 of the Law On Rehabilitation of Victims of Mass Political Repressions of the Republic of Kazakhstan Persons listed in Article 5 of this Law who have been reasonably convicted by courts, as well as subjected to criminal penalties by decisions of non-judicial bodies, in whose cases there is sufficient evidence of the commission of the following crimes, are not subject to rehabilitation.:

Article 6 of the Law On Rehabilitation of Victims of Mass Political Repressions of the Republic of KazakhstanPersons listed in Article 5 of this Law who have been reasonably c...

Read completely »

Article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence of the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Administrative Offenses examined during the consideration of the complaint, the appeal petition of the prosecutor

Article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence of the Code of the Republ...

Read completely »

Presumption of innocence and relevant, admissible evidenceBy the verdict of the Oktyabrsky District Court of the city of Karaganda dated December 28, 2018: S., who had no prev...

Read completely »

Failure by the plaintiff to provide evidence confirming the claims during the court proceedings is a procedural omission by the party, however, the circumstances that arose after the issuance of the judicial act are not grounds for reviewing the judicial act due to newly discovered circumstances.

Failure by the plaintiff to provide evidence confirming the claims during the court proceedings is a procedural omission by the party, however, the circumstances that arose af...

Read completely »