Payment for services is made exclusively to the company's account. For your convenience, we have launched Kaspi RED 😎

Home / Codes / Article 100. Written evidence of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Article 100. Written evidence of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

АMANAT партиясы және Заң және Құқық адвокаттық кеңсесінің серіктестігі аясында елге тегін заң көмегі көрсетілді

Article 100. Written evidence of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

     1. Written evidence is acts, documents, letters of a business or personal nature containing information about circumstances relevant to the case.

     2. Written evidence may be provided by the parties and other persons involved in the case, or requested by the court at their request. Written evidence may also be requested by the court on its own initiative.

     3. Persons who are unable to present the written evidence requested by the court or provide it within the time limit set by the court are obliged to notify the court of this, indicating the reasons for non-fulfillment of the court's requirement.

     4. Written evidence required by the court from citizens and legal entities shall be sent directly to the court. The court may issue a request to the person requesting written evidence for the right to receive it for subsequent submission to the court.

     5. Written evidence is usually presented in the original. If a copy of the document is provided, the court has the right, if necessary, and also in accordance with part five of Article 68 of this Code, to require the presentation of the original.

     If it is difficult to submit the original written evidence to the court, the court may require the submission of duly attested copies and extracts from such a document or to inspect and examine other written evidence at the place of their storage.

     6. Evidence in the form of electronic documents or their copies certified with an electronic digital signature shall be submitted to the court in compliance with the rules established by this article.

     An electronic document is recognized as evidence, except in cases where the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan does not allow the use of only an electronic document.

 

 

  

  

President    

Republic of Kazakhstan     

© 2012. RSE na PHB "Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan" of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan  

 

 Constitution Law Code Standard Decree Order Decision Resolution Lawyer Almaty Lawyer Legal service Legal advice Civil Criminal Administrative cases Disputes Defense Arbitration Law Company Kazakhstan Law Firm Court Cases 

Article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence of the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Administrative Offenses examined during the consideration of the complaint, the appeal petition of the prosecutor

Article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence of the Code of the Republ...

Read completely »

Presumption of innocence and relevant, admissible evidenceBy the verdict of the Oktyabrsky District Court of the city of Karaganda dated December 28, 2018: S., who had no prev...

Read completely »

Article 6 of the Law On Rehabilitation of Victims of Mass Political Repressions of the Republic of Kazakhstan Persons listed in Article 5 of this Law who have been reasonably convicted by courts, as well as subjected to criminal penalties by decisions of non-judicial bodies, in whose cases there is sufficient evidence of the commission of the following crimes, are not subject to rehabilitation.:

Article 6 of the Law On Rehabilitation of Victims of Mass Political Repressions of the Republic of KazakhstanPersons listed in Article 5 of this Law who have been reasonably c...

Read completely »

Article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence of the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Administrative Offenses examined during the consideration of the complaint, the appeal petition of the prosecutor

Article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence of the Code of the Republ...

Read completely »

Presumption of innocence and relevant, admissible evidenceBy the verdict of the Oktyabrsky District Court of the city of Karaganda dated December 28, 2018: S., who had no prev...

Read completely »

Article 6 of the Law On Rehabilitation of Victims of Mass Political Repressions of the Republic of Kazakhstan Persons listed in Article 5 of this Law who have been reasonably convicted by courts, as well as subjected to criminal penalties by decisions of non-judicial bodies, in whose cases there is sufficient evidence of the commission of the following crimes, are not subject to rehabilitation.:

Article 6 of the Law On Rehabilitation of Victims of Mass Political Repressions of the Republic of KazakhstanPersons listed in Article 5 of this Law who have been reasonably c...

Read completely »

On the basis of contradictory responses of the defendants, the unanalyzed truth of which was not compared and not supported by other evidence, the Appellate Judicial Board unreasonably transferred the actions of the convicted persons from Paragraph "B" of Part 3 of Article 179 of the Criminal Code to Part 3 of Article 327 of this code.

On the basis of contradictory responses of the defendants, the unanalyzed truth of which was not compared and not supported by other evidence, the Appellate Judicial Board unr...

Read completely »

Comment to article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence examined during the consideration of the complaint, the prosecutor's appeal motion The Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Administrative Offences

Comment to article 841. Inconsistency of the judge's conclusions on the factual circumstances of the case, as set out in the court's decision, with the evidence examined durin...

Read completely »

Presumption of innocence and relevant, admissible evidenceBy the verdict of the Oktyabrsky District Court of the city of Karaganda dated December 28, 2018: S., who had no prev...

Read completely »

The calculation of the economic damage assessment is evidence when filing a claim for damages, but it is not subject to a separate appeal.LLP "Zh" (hereinafter referred to as...

Read completely »