Payment for services is made exclusively to the company's account. For your convenience, we have launched Kaspi RED 😎

Home / Publications / Increase in the amount of claims the consideration of the case regarding the increased claims continues after the plaintiff provides proof of payment of the state fee within the time limit set by the court.

Increase in the amount of claims the consideration of the case regarding the increased claims continues after the plaintiff provides proof of payment of the state fee within the time limit set by the court.

АMANAT партиясы және Заң және Құқық адвокаттық кеңсесінің серіктестігі аясында елге тегін заң көмегі көрсетілді

Increase in the amount of claims the consideration of the case regarding the increased claims continues after the plaintiff provides proof of payment of the state fee within the time limit set by the court.

According to Part 3 of Article 105 of the CPC, when the amount of claims increases, the consideration of the case regarding the increased claims continues after the plaintiff provides proof of payment of the state fee within the time limit set by the court. In case of failure to submit a document on payment of the state fee, the case is considered and resolved within the limits of the initially stated requirements, with an indication of this in the court decision. The application for an increase in claims is returned to the plaintiff without consideration. Arguments about disagreement with the court's conclusions on the issue of additional payment of the state fee may be included in the appeal. For example, according to the claim of IP K., "M.K." to LLP "Ts" for the recovery of the amount of debt and penalties, the claim for the recovery of penalties in the amount of 262,635 tenge was increased. In this regard, the receipt dated March 27, 2017 made an additional payment of the state fee in the amount of 2,627 tenge, after which the claim was considered taking into account the increase in the stated requirements. An analysis of the cases studied indicates that some judges accept and consider applications for an increase in the claim, while the state fee is not paid by the parties. For example, K. filed a lawsuit against JSC "E" for declaring the bank loan agreement partially invalid and collecting an overpaid amount in the amount of 124,938 tenge. Based on these claims, the plaintiff paid the state fee.

During the trial, the plaintiff increased the claims and claimed not 124,938 tenge, but 153,333 tenge. At the same time, the state fee for the increased amount was not paid. In this case, the court of first instance should not have accepted and considered the application for an increase in claims. Meanwhile, the court considered the case on its merits, the amount of 153,333 tenge was recovered, and the missing state fee in the amount of 303 tenge was recovered from the plaintiff to the state revenue. In another case, a citizen appealed to the court against the actions of the bailiff. During the consideration of the case, he actually presented new claims of a property and non–property nature – he asked the court, in addition to recognizing the bailiff's actions as illegal, to recover the cost of air tickets - 79,988 tenge, to compensate for moral damage in the amount of 1,200,000 tenge. The court accepted D.'s statement. how to increase claims without paying the state fee. In the case concerning the application of L. to D., U. on the establishment of the fact of separation of spouses, the recognition of property as individual property and the release of property from seizure, the state fee was paid as a non-property claim.  During the preparation of the case for trial, at a preliminary hearing, the plaintiff's side was asked to assess the property and pay 1% of the value of the sought part, however, the plaintiff insisted that the specified non-property requirement, payment of a state fee in the amount of 50% of 1 MCI is sufficient. By the ruling of the Kostanay City Court dated April 13, 2016, the claim regarding the property was left without consideration, and the rest of the claims were decided on the merits. The Appellate Judicial Board left the court's ruling unchanged. Given the ambiguous practice on this issue, we consider it necessary to make an addition to the NP explaining the return of the statement of claim or its abandonment due to incomplete payment of the state fee in accordance with Part 3 of Article 105 of the CPC. 

Attention!   

       Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.  

 For more information,  please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085. 

Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office  Court Cases 

Download document

Article 666. State duty rates for issuing visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, processing documents for leaving the Republic of Kazakhstan for permanent residence, issuing and approving invitations for foreigners and stateless persons to enter the Republic of Kazakhstan, acquiring citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan, restoring citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan or renouncing citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan, issuing permanent residence permits in the Republic of Kazakhstan The Tax Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Article 666. State duty rates for issuing visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, processing documents for leaving the Republic of Kazakhstan for permanent residence, issuing and...

Read completely »

Article 670. Exemption from payment of state duty upon approval of invitations of receiving persons for the issuance of visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as upon issuance, restoration or extension of visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan of the Tax Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Article 670. Exemption from payment of state duty upon approval of invitations of receiving persons for the issuance of visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as upon is...

Read completely »

The lawyer for the recovery of the amount of damage caused by an employee in the performance of work duties and the costs of paying the state fee by the Court of First instance incorrectly determined the range of circumstances relevant to the case, and made conclusions that do not correspond to the circumstances established in the case.

The lawyer for the recovery of the amount of damage caused by an employee in the performance of work duties and the costs of paying the state fee by the Court of First instanc...

Read completely »