Payment for services is made exclusively to the company's account. For your convenience, we have launched Kaspi RED 😎

Home / Publications / The correctness of the collection of court costs (state fees, court costs).

The correctness of the collection of court costs (state fees, court costs).

АMANAT партиясы және Заң және Құқық адвокаттық кеңсесінің серіктестігі аясында елге тегін заң көмегі көрсетілді

The correctness of the collection of court costs (state fees, court costs).

A study of the cases showed that when filing lawsuits with the court, the state fee is paid in accordance with the requirements of the Tax Code. When lawsuits are filed by authorized state bodies, no state duty is charged on the basis of subparagraph 16) of Article 541 of the Tax Code. According to paragraph 9 of Regulatory Resolution No. 5, claims by tax authorities and the prosecutor for the liquidation of both absent legal entities and absent debtors are not subject to state duty. By virtue of the provisions of Part 1 of Article 117 of the CPC, the state fee from which the plaintiff was exempted is collected from the defendant, who is not exempt from paying court costs, to the state's income in full or in proportion to the satisfied part of the claim.

The correctness of the collection of court costs (state fees, court costs).

The generalization established that, in general, court costs are not distributed by the courts, since the defendants are absent legal entities, which makes it impossible to enforce the court's decision regarding the collection of state fees from them. Some courts do not collect a state fee from a legal entity, as the court's decision is practically not enforced due to the lack of property.    It seems to be the correct position of the courts, which, if the court imposes the obligation to liquidate an absent legal entity on an authorized body, the court costs are attributed to the republican budget, due to the fact that the procedures for the liquidation of absent legal entities are financed from these funds. 

Attention!   

       Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.  

 For more information,  please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085. 

Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office  Court Cases 

Article 666. State duty rates for issuing visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, processing documents for leaving the Republic of Kazakhstan for permanent residence, issuing and approving invitations for foreigners and stateless persons to enter the Republic of Kazakhstan, acquiring citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan, restoring citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan or renouncing citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan, issuing permanent residence permits in the Republic of Kazakhstan The Tax Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Article 666. State duty rates for issuing visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, processing documents for leaving the Republic of Kazakhstan for permanent residence, issuing and...

Read completely »

Article 670. Exemption from payment of state duty upon approval of invitations of receiving persons for the issuance of visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as upon issuance, restoration or extension of visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan of the Tax Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Article 670. Exemption from payment of state duty upon approval of invitations of receiving persons for the issuance of visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as upon is...

Read completely »

The lawyer for the recovery of the amount of damage caused by an employee in the performance of work duties and the costs of paying the state fee by the Court of First instance incorrectly determined the range of circumstances relevant to the case, and made conclusions that do not correspond to the circumstances established in the case.

The lawyer for the recovery of the amount of damage caused by an employee in the performance of work duties and the costs of paying the state fee by the Court of First instanc...

Read completely »