Payment for services is made exclusively to the company's account. For your convenience, we have launched Kaspi RED 😎

Home / Codes / Article 107. Refund of the state fee of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Article 107. Refund of the state fee of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

АMANAT партиясы және Заң және Құқық адвокаттық кеңсесінің серіктестігі аясында елге тегін заң көмегі көрсетілді

Article 107. Refund of the state fee of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

     The procedure for refunding the state duty is determined by the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Taxes and Other Mandatory Payments to the Budget" (Tax Code). 

 

   

 

President    

Republic of Kazakhstan     

© 2012. RSE na PHB "Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan" of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan  

 Constitution Law Code Standard Decree Order Decision Resolution Lawyer Almaty Lawyer Legal service Legal advice Civil Criminal Administrative cases Disputes Defense Arbitration Law Company Kazakhstan Law Firm Court Cases 

Article 666. State duty rates for issuing visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, processing documents for leaving the Republic of Kazakhstan for permanent residence, issuing and approving invitations for foreigners and stateless persons to enter the Republic of Kazakhstan, acquiring citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan, restoring citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan or renouncing citizenship of the Republic of Kazakhstan, issuing permanent residence permits in the Republic of Kazakhstan The Tax Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Article 666. State duty rates for issuing visas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, processing documents for leaving the Republic of Kazakhstan for permanent residence, issuing and...

Read completely »

The lawyer for the recovery of the amount of damage caused by an employee in the performance of work duties and the costs of paying the state fee by the Court of First instance incorrectly determined the range of circumstances relevant to the case, and made conclusions that do not correspond to the circumstances established in the case.

The lawyer for the recovery of the amount of damage caused by an employee in the performance of work duties and the costs of paying the state fee by the Court of First instanc...

Read completely »