Payment for services is made exclusively to the company's account. For your convenience, we have launched Kaspi RED 😎

Home / Publications / Bringing to administrative responsibility for the Sale of tobacco products without the use of a cash register machine does not apply to violations of the requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the sale of tobacco and tobacco products

Bringing to administrative responsibility for the Sale of tobacco products without the use of a cash register machine does not apply to violations of the requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the sale of tobacco and tobacco products

АMANAT партиясы және Заң және Құқық адвокаттық кеңсесінің серіктестігі аясында елге тегін заң көмегі көрсетілді

Bringing to administrative responsibility for the Sale of tobacco products without the use of a cash register machine does not apply to violations of the requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the sale of tobacco and tobacco products  

By the resolution of the Denisovsky District Court of Kostanay region dated April 11, 2013, individual entrepreneur T. was brought to administrative responsibility under part 1 of Article 163-3 of the Administrative Code with the imposition of an administrative penalty in the form of a fine in the amount of 36 420 tenge. By the ruling of the Kostanay Regional Court dated May 04, 2013, the decision of the court of first instance was left unchanged, the prosecutor's protest was not satisfied. In the protest, the Deputy Prosecutor General of the Republic of Kazakhstan asks to cancel the judicial acts that took place and terminate the proceedings in the case due to the absence of an administrative offense in the actions of the individual entrepreneur due to the inconsistency of the judge's conclusions with the actual circumstances of the case. According to the protocol on an administrative offense, the individual entrepreneur T. On April 01, 2013, she sold tobacco products without using a cash register, which violated the requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the sale of tobacco and tobacco products. Meanwhile, paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 of Article 159 of the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On the Health of the People and the Healthcare System" provide for an exhaustive list of requirements that must be met when selling tobacco and tobacco products, among which there is no requirement to use a cash register.  Thus, the revealed violation does not relate to violations of the requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the sale of tobacco and tobacco products, respectively, the actions of individual entrepreneur T. cannot be qualified under part 1 of Article 163-3 of the Administrative Code. In addition, according to the revealed fact of the sale of tobacco products without the use of a cash register machine, by a resolution of the tax administration for the Denisovsky district dated April 01, 2013, an individual entrepreneur T. She was brought to administrative responsibility under part 1 of Article 215 of the Administrative Code, a special rule providing for liability for violating the procedure for using cash registers established by tax legislation.

Bringing to administrative responsibility for the Sale of tobacco products without the use of a cash register machine does not apply to violations of the requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the sale of tobacco and tobacco products  

In accordance with subparagraph 1) of Article 665 of the Administrative Code, the grounds for revoking or changing the decision in the case of an administrative offense are the inconsistency of the conclusions of the judge, body (official) on the factual circumstances of the case set out in the decision on the case of an administrative offense, examined during the examination of the complaint, protest evidence. In such circumstances, the protest is justified and must be satisfied. The Supervisory Judicial Board of the Supreme Court overturned the decision of the Denisovsky District Court of the Kostanay region and the ruling of the Kostanay Regional Court regarding the individual entrepreneur T., and terminated the proceedings in the case due to the absence of an administrative offense in her actions provided for in Part 1 of Article 163-3 of the Administrative Code. 

Attention!   

       Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.  

 For more information,  please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085. 

Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office  Court Cases 

Download document

Article 18. The procedure for issuing permits to attract money from equity holders in the organization of shared-equity housing construction by participating in a second-tier bank project or after the construction of the frame of an apartment building The Law on Equity Participation in Housing Construction

Article 18. The procedure for issuing permits to attract money from equity holders in the organization of shared-equity housing construction by participating in a second-tier...

Read completely »

Community Service

Community ServiceArticle 43 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (CC RK) regulates the application of punishment in the form of community service. Below is a det...

Read completely »

Article 7. All cases against persons specified in Article 5 of this Law, as well as cases against persons placed for forced treatment in psychiatric institutions for political reasons, with court decisions not revoked at the time of the enactment of this Law, are subject to mandatory verification. The Law on Rehabilitation of Victims of Mass Political Repressions of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Article 7. All cases against persons specified in Article 5 of this Law, as well as cases against persons placed for forced treatment in psychiatric institutions for political...

Read completely »